To compensate defrauded of savings banks that have proliferated in our country in recent months and will grow exponentially in the remainder of this year, requires the formulation of a lay by congress, is not sufficient for such Indeed the adoption of a point of agreement in the House of Representatives, no, at least if we assume that the budget approved late last year to this fiscal year does not provide any game that allows for such compensation.
Overall, the cheating of an investor or the account holder becomes a strictly ventilated conflict between individuals, whose solution corresponds to undertake the individual concerned exclusively with the assistance of counsel of their trusts and to ministerial and judicial authorities of the case.
However, when a private conflict of interest, dramatically affects many people, that conflict inevitably becomes a political issue, perhaps why, in such circumstances, as my admired teacher said Jose Angel Conchello, the origin of such unfortunate situation should be probed precisely in the very exercise of political power.
Given the situation, then up to the leadership of the political community, as Aquinas said, addressing bisos social solution to the problem presented, always trying to do, certainly with the greatest possible social sensitivity, but also with the greater responsibility that requires delicate situation.
Article 126 of the Constitution of the United Mexican States provides that: "No payment may be made that is not included in the budget or determined by subsequent law."
Between us, the budget takes the form of a decree passed exclusively by the Chamber of Deputies in accordance with Article 74 Section IV of the Constitution, not to take the force of law, since it was established and in the 1857 Constitution that was originally unicameral character.
The restoration of the Senate, the constitutional reform of November 13, 1874 led by President Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada, not endow the budget of the condition of act of Congress, unlike the budget as regulated in previous highlights, these being namely the Mexican Federal Constitution of October 4, 1824 and the Constitution in Philadelphia.
The text of Article 126 which states: "No payment may be made that is not included in the budget or determined by subsequent law" leaves no doubt in that, to make a payment not included in the budget it must be determined by law in a material and formal, and therefore correspond approval to both chambers of Congress.
That article 126, by requiring that a payment not included in the budget should be determined by law, subject to the approval of this law the requirement that it must be thoroughly grounded in the Constitution, of luck and so that in the present case, the basis for issuing a law that would allow the Treasury Federal Tax compensate defrauded the Savings and Loan, would be the fraction X Article 73 gives effect to the allocation to Congress to legislate on "financial services".
law to be approved by Congress for her based on the Federal Tax Treasury to compensate defrauded in question is really a supplementary law to the Law on Savings and Loan.
Once, in mathematical terms and actuarial reserves had been made of the various funds for that purpose provided for in the Federal Fiscal Responsibility Act could be allocated for the compensation amounts leading to fiscal surpluses prove remnants. Any
consideration or proposal that was done in contravention of the provisions for that purpose by the Federal Fiscal Responsibility Act could generate immediate sympathy for those affected by the embezzlement matter of these lines, but it would be more than cynical demagoguery, as in essentially you are saving credits drawn by the National Mortgage Finance for the destitute and broken sofoles.
Finally, it would be convenient for others, that the law in question provides for the Treasury Federal Tax attribution of action against individuals who have committed embezzlement cases, regardless of liability civil and criminal matters where those had incurred, being fully equipped to do the right Coercive Economic and by operation of law.
sandrini2006@hotmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment